
Last week, when blogging about UK politics, I said:
I reckon there’s something wrong with all expenses over £100,000. Forget second home, that’s a second flipping salary, that is.
But that was before I came across this Monday’s findings of the Tax Payers’ Alliance (TPA - a group campaining for better spending of UK taxes). And I thought UK politics was bad.
The TPA somehow got their eager campaigning hands on a leaked EU document called the Galvin Report (download here), which, it says:
revealed so many examples of poor financial controls, dubious practices and outright abuse of taxpayers’ money that it was kept secret from the public, and only a handful of MPs were allowed to see it on the condition that its contents were never revealed.
But the crux of the TPA’s findings - which should help dear old Jacqui Smith (UK Home Secretary) sleep better at night - is the following:
Over and above their salaries an MEP can personally earn a further £1 million during a typical Parliamentary term through their generous allowances and expenses
The report was based on a sample of 167 payments, out of a total of 4686, made in October 2004. And I’m going to assume - with, I grant you, no proof what so ever - that as the report has only just been published, repercussions have been somewhat lacking - and things have only got worse.
But there’s more. Because, it seems, £1 million might not cover quite as much glass and mussels as an MEP might like, the TPA also state that MEPs can expect a 47 per cent pay rise after this June’s elections; British MEPs could soon earn a ‘take-home’ salery of £68,801.
By george. I want tips! What sneaky tricks are these MEPs resorting to? I want to take notes in order to make the most of my future expenses-fuelled career as a journalist… (Difference being that I’ll be earning approximately £54,801 less than a British MEP.)
Thanks to the report, I now know that - if one wants to make the most of one’s expenses - one should claim money for fictional assistants, of which no record exists. And pay any assistants that do exist up to 20 times their salary - just to use up the full allowance. I should also, if so inclined, claim money for companies who have done absolutely no work for me.
This, it transpires, works for European Parliament members. I have a feeling it won’t work quite as well for a trainee journo.
Still, prior to this discovery I was feeling guilty about my two EU-expenses-paid trips to Brussels. I must admit, I feel a tad better now.
Hi,
Interesting post.
This might be of some interest to you?
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/008-50236-054-02-09-901-20090224IPR50235-23-02-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm
Cheers,
lska
Hi Iska.
Thanks for pointing out the horrific one-sided nature of my post. In hindsight, I should definitely have questioned the findings. (Although I often find one-sided blogging a far more interesting read..!)
Despite this, you link to the Parliament’s website which is also going to be very one-sided.
Ah the dilemma of being a journalist/blogger/writer: who to believe…
Your content is very interesting, bookmarked
regards khhudf
Fantastic website, must come back here , very interesting content, bookmarked your blog
regards fuserarvh
WOW, i like your blog theme, content is very interesting, bookmarked, regards
Subject of your post is very interesting, bookmarked, regards hlonkoburg
Interesting read, your blog is awsome, bookmarked, regards biurkosram
skuteczne odchudzanie
Nice work, interesting blog, keep us posting, if you want click here and learn how to earn money fast
Amazing article, its true, im sure that you have really really true…